Close to four in ten pensioners in Scotland state they would be prepared to pay for some non-life threatening treatments, such as cataract and haemorrhoid removal, if the money saved was spent on social care.

The survey for the Herald newspaper, based on a sample of 561 Scots above the age of 65, asked respondents the following question: “Currently all treatments on the NHS are free at the point of use   Would you be prepared to pay for some non-life threatening treatments, such as cataract and haemorrhoid removal, if the money saved was spent on social care?”

39% of over-65s said they would back such a move, providing that all savings were ring-fenced for the purposes of financing social care.  However, close to have said they opposed the suggestion (49%), with 13% stating don’t know.

Interestingly, support was higher among pensioners with higher household incomes; 60% of those with incomes above £45,000 supported the suggestion, as compared to only 36% of those with incomes below £15,000, and 31% of those with incomes between £15,000 and £24,000.

Fieldwork dates and methodology can be found here.

A full breakdown of these results can be found here.

For a more detailed breakdown of results from this poll, or any other results from our polling series, please get in touch by email or phone.

polling@bmgresearch.co.uk

@BMGResearch

0121 333 6006

  Rob Struthers – Graduate Research Executive